The Innovation Attorney Podcast
The Innovation Attorney Podcast · Oct 9, 2026 · 14:15
Listen in the Podli app 🎧
Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.
Founders outside frontier AI should size a seed or Series A to one verifiable milestone, because 27 rounds of $1 billion or more took a third of Q3 2026 funding. The qualified small business stock exclusion, the SBIR matching rule, and the next investor’s valuation test all depend on how large the round is.
A company that raises a $90 million seed round has just disqualified every share it issued from the qualified small business stock exclusion, and none of the investors who wrote the check will mention it. Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended in July 2025, measures gross assets immediately after issuance, so the cash from the round counts. A cash raise the size of the $480 million seed round Humans& closed this year would exceed the $75 million limit more than six times over.
Under Section 1202 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended in July 2025, stock issued by a company with more than $75 million in gross assets immediately after issuance does not qualify for the exclusion.
Most founders outside frontier AI never see a round that large, and that is the point. The quarter that produced Databricks and Safe Superintelligence at $5 billion each also produced $13 billion of seed funding and $40.6 billion of early stage funding, up 25 percent from a year earlier. Artificial intelligence companies took $102 billion, 64 percent of the total, which leaves about $57 billion for everyone else. Seed and early stage together came to about $53.6 billion, nearly the same as the 27 giant rounds.
Capital is available at seed, and prices vary by a wide margin. The 95th percentile seed valuation hit $200 million in the second quarter, up from $72.2 million a year earlier, and the median Series A for a foundation model company sat near $300 million after the money went in while companies outside AI sat near $55 million. A typical software Series A in the six months to July raised $14.4 million and sold about 18 percent of the company. If you price your seed against the top percentile, you will need a Series A that a spreadsheet can defend about 1.9 years later, which is the median gap between the two rounds. Valuations in the second quarter passed their 2021 highs at every stage, and the down round rate was 11.4 percent in the first quarter.
On a nuclear submarine the length of a patrol is set by what you load before leaving the pier and how carefully you ration it. A seed round works the same way. Raise enough for roughly 24 months and one milestone that someone outside your company can verify: paid contracts, a passed qualification test, a regulatory clearance, a manufacturing yield. Then stop adding dilution.
The next mechanic is the federal money, and it changes the math on the size of the round. Congress let SBIR and STTR lapse for six months before the Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act restored them on April 13, 2026, through September 30, 2031.
The Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act, signed April 13, 2026, authorizes Strategic Breakthrough awards of up to $30 million over 48 months, and generally requires private capital matching the award dollar for dollar.
A seed or Series A that closes before the proposal is filed can supply that match. The same act orders agencies to screen applicants against federal watchlists for foreign ties and to disclose the basis for a denial, so every investor on the cap table, and every side letter, becomes part of the application. A company that learns this after the solicitation opens has already lost weeks.
Then there is the pitch itself. Investors screen for AI because AI companies took 49 percent of pre seed dollars in the first half of 2026 and 64 percent of all third quarter funding. The temptation to relabel a physical or services business is strong, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has shown what it costs. In April 2025 it sued Albert Saniger in the Southern District of New York, alleging that Nate, the shopping app he founded, told investors it used artificial intelligence to complete purchases when contract workers entered many orders by hand, after raising more than $42 million. State your AI use as cost per unit, cycle time, or gross margin, and you can defend every number in diligence.
Capital is also moving to physical categories. Aerospace, robotics, data centers, semiconductors, and energy each raised $10 billion or more in the third quarter. If your company sits in one of them, say so, and name the buyers.
In thirty years of counseling technology companies, the cap table surprise that costs founders the most is the one nobody modeled before the first instrument was signed. In the second quarter of 2026, investors put $3.19 billion into more than 11,500 pre seed instruments at an average of $276,000, and the few deals above $2.5 million typically stacked ten or more of them, with caps reaching $100 million at the 90th percentile. Each SAFE converts at its own cap. Model all of them before you sign the next one.
What a seed founder should do with a quarter like this
Price against the median, size the round under the $75 million gross assets line, line up the SBIR match before you file, and describe AI with numbers you can defend. Whether the third quarter concentration repeats in the fourth is unknown, since total funding already fell 25 percent from the second quarter, so build the plan on the median and not on the top.
The next piece takes up SAFE stacking: how ten or more pre seed instruments with different valuation caps convert at a priced round, and the one drafting change that fixes the dilution before the first instrument is signed.
Interested in analysis about the intersection of venture capital, tech, artificial intelligence, public policy and the law? Check out my Substack channel. https://theinnovationattorney.substack.com/
Episodes: The Innovation Attorney Podcast