Listen in the Podli app 🎧
Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.
Apollo's Torsten Slok says AI has delivered zero financial payoff outside Big Tech. Stephen on why the payoff is real but not being collected, the Bill of Work problem, the 1980s upskilling lag, and how a CEO should judge the AI line item. Lightning on Sweden locking staff to Microsoft Copilot, and why one capable agent often beats a swarm.
In this episode, Stephen Forte covers:
- Zero payoff on the spreadsheet. Torsten Slok of Apollo finds Mag 7 rising on revenue per worker and margins, while the other four hundred ninety three S and P 500 companies stay flat. Token spend is starting to look like a cost center. TechCrunch amplified the chart for board packs.
- The payoff is not missing. It is not being collected. Companies bought seats, tokens, and pilots, and left the work the same. The motor bolted onto the old line shaft.
- Bill of Work and excess capacity. Time saved is capacity, not cash. Excess capacity does not hit the P and L unless owners map it back in and decide how to use it. Seats and tokens are the wrong scoreboard.
- The 1980s upskilling lag. Computers on desks did not move efficiency overnight. People adjust, then workflows change, then efficiencies dial into the P and L. Investment without a destination is just spend with better branding.
- How a CEO should judge AI spend. Not logins, tokens, or pilots launched. Ask whether one important workflow was redesigned, whether cost and cycle time moved, and whether owners already decided where freed capacity goes.
- Homework before Wednesday. Pick one workflow. Write down what it costs and how long it takes. Do not renew an AI line item that cannot move that number or say where freed capacity goes.
- Lightning: Sweden. Government Offices blocked ChatGPT and Claude on staff computers and pointed people at Microsoft Copilot. Cautious is fair for government. Labs can feel like a black box. Private companies have more room to pick the best tool.
- Lightning: one agent vs a swarm. Anthropic Applied AI says one capable agent with skills on demand often beats a committee of subagents. Rifle shot work favors one well connected operator like Grok Bot. Swarms can still win on segmented research.
Sources:
- Apollo / Torsten Slok, Daily Spark, 24 October 2026: https://www.apollo.com/wealth/insights-news/insights/daily-spark/no-signs-of-ai-payoff-outside-the-tech-sector
- TechCrunch, 25 October 2026: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/25/ai-delivers-zero-financial-payoff-to-most-companies-according-to-apollo-economist/
- Apollo, 5 October 2026 (productivity lag): https://www.apollo.com/wealth/insights-news/insights/daily-spark/No-signs-of-AI-in-the-productivity-data
- Sweden Government Offices block ChatGPT and Claude, steer to Copilot (26 October 2026): https://decrypt.co/381763/sweden-government-offices-block-chatgpt-claude
- Anthropic Applied AI, When to fold subagents into your main agent loop (22 October 2026): https://claude.com/resources/articles/building-agents-when-to-fold-subagents-into-your-main-agent-loop
The AI Brief from the YPO Technology Network is a daily executive briefing on the AI developments that matter to business leaders. Hosted by Stephen Forte.
