What a Defense Attorney Would Need to Acquit Matthew Farwell

The prosecution has Farwell's DNA on the strap, phone data that puts him in her building, and a motive prosecutors say started when Sandra Birchmore was fifteen. The defense has a woman's mental health history going back to age six, a medical examiner who changed her own ruling, and an investigation so broken that it took the FBI to reopen it three years later. Tony and Bob Motta go through each pillar of the defense — the fingernail exclusion, the pressured examiner, the broken investigation — and ask whether any of them creates enough doubt to keep Farwell out of prison.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #FarwellTrial #StoughtonPolice #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #BirchmoreCase #Massachusetts #TrueCrimePodcast