Cybersecurity Tech Brief By HackerNoon
Cybersecurity Tech Brief By HackerNoon · Aug 5, 2026 · 13:56
Listen in the Podli app 🎧
Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.
This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/inside-dnp3-building-an-outstation-from-the-ground-up.
Hands-on DNP3 protocol analysis in Python: state machines, transport reassembly anomalies, administrative functions, and Secure Authentication (SA v5).
Check more stories related to cybersecurity at: https://hackernoon.com/c/cybersecurity.
You can also check exclusive content about #cybersecurity, #scada, #ot-security, #ics-ot-security, #dnp3-protocol, #python, #reverse-engineering, #inside-dnp3, and more.
This story was written by: @404saint. Learn more about this writer by checking @404saint's about page,
and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.
We built a custom Python-based DNP3 lab to analyze protocol mechanics from the raw socket layer up across 5 phases:
1. Reconnaissance: Parsed Class 0 Integrity Reads to extract Internal Indication (IIN) status bytes (e.g: IIN1.7 Device Restart).
2. Control Execution: Evaluated Select-Before-Operate (SBO) workflows, verifying that un-armed `OPERATE` (`FC 0x04`) requests are rejected while `DIRECT OPERATE` (`FC 0x05`) waives arming.
3. Administrative Functions: Tested system-level functions (FC 0x0D, FC 0x0E, FC 0x12, FC 0x18), showing how `STOP APPLICATION` halts application-layer processing while the network socket remains reachable.
4. Transport Layer: Probed single-byte transport header reassembly (FIR/FIN/SEQ) using orphaned fragments to trigger IIN2.2 errors, and verified unsolicited response forgery (FC 0x82).
5. Secure Authentication (SA v5): Implemented IEEE 1815-2012 Group 120 challenge-response HMAC exchanges to secure critical function codes without encrypting underlying payloads.
Episodes: Cybersecurity Tech Brief By HackerNoon