Podlipodcast player Webplayer

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Sandra Birchmore: The Suicide Ruling Left WHAT Out?!

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews · Nov 14, 2026 · 37:11

0:0037:11

Listen in the Podli app 🎧

Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.

The most consequential decision in a death investigation may come before anyone enters a courtroom: the decision about which questions are worth asking. Sandra Birchmore was 23 and pregnant when she was found dead in Canton, Massachusetts, in February 2021. An early state investigation treated her death as suicide. Federal prosecutors subsequently alleged that former Stoughton detective Matthew Farwell killed her to stop her from revealing crimes. Farwell has pleaded not guilty.

Tony Brueski brings together Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI Special Agent, and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI behavioral expert, for a closer look at the evidence and the people responsible for evaluating it. Trial testimony described an interview of Farwell by Trooper Matthew Dunne and then-Sergeant John Fanning in a school parking lot without a recording. The original medical examiner’s account also reflected information provided by investigators, raising questions when other evidence emerged.

The examiner’s original 2021 suicide designation was later revised to undetermined. That is not the same as a homicide ruling. The federal prosecution argues the first investigative response failed to consider crucial facts. Defense lawyers say Sandra died by suicide and question whether federal forensic conclusions support the charged offense.

Closing arguments on November 6 placed these disagreements directly before jurors. Prosecutor Brian Fogerty argued that Sandra’s texts and Farwell’s actions should be considered together; the defense challenged the government’s interpretation. Coffindaffer explains the investigative value of documentation, corroboration and independent review. Dreeke considers how an officer’s perceived authority can influence an investigation involving a young woman.

On November 9, jurors said they were deadlocked. The judge asked them to continue deliberating November 10. No result is assumed here. The story is about what the evidence can prove and what happens when the people charged with gathering it may have made decisions that narrowed the search too soon.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #FarwellTrial #StoughtonPolice #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #JusticeForSandra #PoliceAccountability #TrueCrime

Episodes: True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

PodliGet the free Podli app
↓ App