Podlipodcast player Webplayer

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Sandra Birchmore: An Officer Was Hired After WHAT?!

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews · Nov 7, 2026 · 50:48

0:0050:48

Listen in the Podli app 🎧

Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.

In 2011, a Stoughton police chief wrote that William Farwell's past behavior was incompatible with police work. In 2017, the department hired him. Years later, William testified under immunity in the federal trial of his twin brother Matthew, a former detective accused of murdering Sandra Birchmore. That span of years is essential to understanding what went wrong around the young woman who entered a police youth program looking for a career in law enforcement.

Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral expert Robin Dreeke trace the difference between a troubling allegation and an institutional decision documented in records. Internal findings described misconduct involving Sandra and Stoughton officers associated with the Police Explorers program, including its former leader Robert Devine. Prosecutors argue Matthew's relationship with Sandra began while she was underage and became a hidden system of control. They point to messages and instructions to delete communications, along with allegations that Matthew demanded Sandra re-earn his trust after she told him about William.

On January 20, 2021, a worried friend contacted the department. Dispatcher James Fitton later testified that Matthew reacted with anger to the news of the call, told him not to discuss it, and sent a hostile text. Fitton said the handwritten note of the caller's report was discarded. Why was there no more effective response to the concern? The answer matters beyond one defendant.

Federal prosecutors accuse Matthew Farwell of killing Sandra and staging her death as a suicide to hide wrongdoing. His defense says the relationship was wrong but that he did not kill her. He has pleaded not guilty, and the jury must decide criminal responsibility.

This combined episode explores the family of decisions around the Farwell brothers: the mentoring program, hiring warnings, testimony about overlapping relationships, and a department response that deserves scrutiny. The most revealing questions begin before the alleged crime itself.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #StoughtonPolice #WilliamFarwell #FarwellTrial #RobertDevine #TrueCrime #JusticeForSandra

Episodes: True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

PodliGet the free Podli app
↓ App