Podlipodcast player Webplayer

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Sandra Birchmore: The Examiner Changed WHAT—and Why?!

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns · Nov 8, 2026 · 29:50

0:0029:50

Listen in the Podli app 🎧

Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.

A medical examiner can only assess what is available. But what happens when the information brought to her office has already decided what the scene means? Dr. María del Mar Capó-Martínez testified that the police descriptions of Sandra Birchmore’s death identified suicide and no foul play. The office did not inspect the apartment at investigators’ request. Its subsequent inquiries produced little fresh information. Months later, Sandra’s death was formally classified as suicide.

Years later, that finding changed to undetermined, opening two very different arguments in Matthew Farwell’s federal trial. Prosecutors say the early investigation narrowed its own field of vision. Farwell’s attorneys say the revised ruling offers no affirmative proof of homicide. Neither position can simply be substituted for a medical examiner’s finding.

Tony Brueski is joined by Eric Faddis, a former prosecutor and defense attorney, and retired FBI behavioral expert Robin Dreeke for a sharp look at the distinction between evidence and interpretation. They examine how investigators’ first impressions affect a forensic record, then turn to the evidence the defense highlights. Paternity testing showed Farwell was not the father of Sandra’s unborn child. The defense argues this undercuts the government’s theory of motive; prosecutors contend that Farwell and Sandra’s understanding of her pregnancy is the relevant question. A lack of DNA under her fingernails and an absence of obvious struggle injuries are also part of the defense account.

Farwell has pleaded not guilty to federal charges arising from Sandra’s death. To convict on the witness-killing theory, jurors must assess not only whether he killed her, but why. Can “undetermined” be a fair final medical answer while the rest of the evidence still points jurors in competing directions?

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #FarwellTrial #MedicalExaminer #DeathInvestigation #EricFaddis #RobinDreeke #Massachusetts #TrueCrime

Episodes: Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

PodliGet the free Podli app
↓ App