Why Lindsay Clancy's Defense Completely Changed Course

During Lindsay Clancy's trial, Kevin Reddington never denied she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. His defense was postpartum psychosis — she did it, but she wasn't criminally responsible. He offered to stipulate the act in writing. The jury deadlocked 11-1 in favor of acquittal, and the judge declared a mistrial. Then Reddington walked into court and argued there is no evidence Clancy killed her children at all. The Rule 25 motion is a request for the judge to dismiss the case outright. Prosecutors were stunned, calling it the first time they'd heard this argument. The hearing set for November 2 will determine whether the motion has legs — or whether this is a calculated play to build an appellate record before the retrial. Clancy has pleaded not guilty.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #Rule25 #PlymouthCourt #Mistrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MassachusettsCrime