BJGP Interviews · Jun 3, 2025 · 17:24
Listen in the Podli app 🎧
Follow your favourite podcasts, listen offline and in the car with CarPlay and Android Auto, and always pick up where you left off. Free to try.
Today, we’re speaking to Dr Jamie Scuffell, GP and NIHR In Practice Fellow at King’s College London.
Title of paper: Patterns in GP Appointment Systems: a cluster analysis of 3480 English practices
Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0556
GP practices in the UK are using a wide range of different appointment systems to meet patient demand and improve access. This cluster analysis of NHS appointment data from 56 million appointments and 3480 English practices demonstrates two predominant models of primary care delivery. ‘Same day’ practices tend to fulfil appointments on the same day using GP telephone consultations. ‘Routine care’ practices tend to employ non-GP staff members offering face-to-face appointments and longer appointment wait times. ‘Same day’ care practices had younger and more urban populations.
Episode transcript
This transcript was generated using AI and has not been reviewed for accuracy. Please be aware it may contain errors or omissions.
Speaker A
00:00:00.640 - 00:00:54.360
Hello and welcome to BJGP Interviews. I'm Nada Khan and I'm one of the Associate Editors of the bjgp. Thanks for listening to this podcast today. In today's episode, we're speaking to Dr.
Jamie Scuffle, who is a GP in South London and an NIHR In Practice Fellow at King's College London. We're here to talk about a really topical issue in his new paper here in the bjgp.
The paper is called Paper Patterns in GP Appointment A cluster analysis of 3,480 English practices.
So, hi, Jamie, it's really great to meet you and talk about this work, I guess, really just to start, as you point out in this paper, each practice has their own systems and strategies to manage appointment booking. But how do you think that this impacts on access and patient appointment booking in each practice?
Speaker B
00:00:55.000 - 00:02:17.300
Yeah, it's interesting because I think, as you say, appointment systems have developed even further, really, since COVID and we've ended up with this a quite interesting diverse range of implementing appointments across the country, across England at least.
And I suppose the things that have changed are, you know, if you phone up a practice now, actually, you might not even phone them up, you might submit an online consult, you might be triaged, you might see not a gp, but a range of other professionals as well. And also it might not be done face to face, it might be done by telephone or online.
In fact, there's a new appointment system range of things that have happened across England, and actually there's some evidence that that might relate to access in some ways. So we know lots of people who don't speak English struggle to navigate that system of getting an appointment, for example.
And we also know from the qualitative evidence that there's some digital exclusion as well with appointments. So, yeah, so I think there's lots of issues with access and how that relates to appointment systems.
And so far what we've done is looked at components of the appointment system and how that then affects access. But what we haven't really done much of is looking at the appointment system as a whole and how that might affect access.
Speaker A
00:02:18.180 - 00:02:33.200
Yeah.
So in this study, you wanted to look at patterns of primary care delivery in English GP practices, and you used this Appointments in General Practice data set. Can you tell us just briefly what's available in this data and what you were looking at here?
Speaker B
00:02:33.360 - 00:03:20.700
It's a tremendous data set and I think could be very useful. So every English GP practice for every day of the week publishes up to NHS England.
The appointments that have Happened for the day across lots of different categories, actually, so across whether they've been attended or not, or not attended, whether they're face to face or telephone or home visits or online also if they're GP or non GP appointments. And the sort of. The real clincher that is brand new is looking at appointment lead times as well.
Whether these appointments were booked same day or whether they were booked more in advance when the data is good enough, which is an. If it's a very, very useful data set.
Speaker A
00:03:20.780 - 00:03:43.720
Yeah, so you looked at data from about three and a half thousand practices this year. So as you mentioned, you weren't able to look at all practices due to quality issues.
But just talk us through what you were looking at here and I guess, yeah, just start us off with telling us what you found and perhaps we'll get into how you group the practices as well into clusters. But yeah, tell us a bit more about what you found here.
Speaker B
00:03:43.720 - 00:05:23.440
What we wanted to do was take a set of measures, I suppose, of an appointment book.
So for every practice we said, well, actually we might define their appointment book by the proportion of people who see a GP or the proportion of people who have a telephone consult, or the proportion of people who are booked same day and seen same day. And we kind of came up with actually about 12, in the end, 12 measures of an appointment book.
What we then wanted to do was kind of group together practices with similar characteristics and we picked two different types. I suppose these were the two poles at either end of the spectrum.
And the two poles are that there's a more traditional, what we've called a routine care